Fertile Thoughts

Go Back   Fertile Thoughts > Community Forums > Debate Board
Register Blogs HELP/FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read
Chat Users (0) Infertility Information Gallery Online Infertility Book Tickers Green Forum Site Home Page
Register Forum Home Acronyms NEW USERS Avatar Maker COMMUNITY GUIDELINES Free Avatars Clinic Search Recipe Site Contact Us


Currently Active Chat Room Users: 0 | Scheduled Chat Room Events
View Who's Online
Users in Chat Rooms:
No one's chatting right now!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-27-2009, 02:55 PM   #1 (permalink)
10000-15000 post ace of hearts
 
Maddy00's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 13,020
Blog Entries: 368
Maddy00 Level 25 Maddy00 Level 25 Maddy00 Level 25 Maddy00 Level 25 Maddy00 Level 25 Maddy00 Level 25 Maddy00 Level 25 Maddy00 Level 25 Maddy00 Level 25 Maddy00 Level 25 Maddy00 Level 25
Senator Coburn gets it right, as usual

This article was written by Oklahoma Senator Coburn (R). I have immense respect for him. He is a family friend and an OB/GYN by trade. Obama and co. would do well to pay attention..he nailed it on every angle!

RealClearPolitics - Lessons for the White House from the Doctor Fix Debacle

October 27, 2009
Lessons for the White House from the Doctor Fix Debacle
By Sen. Tom Coburn

The day after White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel's Clintonesque plan to triangulate and divide Republicans and doctors failed a major newspaper published this headline: "Democrats Lose Big Test Vote on Health Legislation." The title was so fair and balanced many media obsessed White House advisers could have attributed it to Fox News. Yet, it was the New York Times that captured in a well-written, fair and subtle story the depth of the challenge the White House faces in its push to enact major health care reform legislation.

As the Times reported, "[Majority Leader Reid] needed 60 votes to proceed. He won only 47. And he could not blame Republicans. A dozen Democrats and one independent crossed party lines and voted with Republicans ..."

The first lesson for the White House in this defeat is that public concern about the deficit is real, not manufactured. Twelve Democrats opposed the Emanuel strategy not just on principle but sound political judgment. Senate Democrats understand that voters, by a two to one margin, want Congress to address the deficit first, then health care. They knew that the effort to spend a quarter of a trillion dollar outside of the reform process was shameless and fiscally irresponsible. As Ron Wyden (D-WA), one of the "no" votes, said in the Times article, "On the eve of a historic debate on health care, it's essential to show a commitment to real reform," which includes fiscal responsibility.

The Washington Post - not Fox News - went farther and blasted the Emanuel/Reid triangulation strategy, calling it "nonsensical" and "sleight of hand." As the Post wrote: "The political imperative is twofold: to make certain that Republicans don't use the physician payment issue to bring down the larger bill and to placate the American Medical Association ... A president who says that he is serious about dealing with the dire fiscal picture cannot credibly begin by charging this one to the national credit card, with no concern for the later generations who will have to pay the bill."

The nation's doctors also understood the strategy and weren't impressed by Emanuel and Reid's plan to manipulate them into backing off of their support for tort reform. A poll on Sermo.com - a Facebook-like site which represents 110,000 real world physicians who sacrifice their own time to participate in a serious public debate about health care (in contrast to the American Medical Association, which represents itself and its Washington lobbying shop) included troubling results for the Democrats negotiating in secret. Sixty-five percent of nearly 1,000 respondents said they were "very concerned" about the Senate passing a fix for their own profession that was not offset, and 77 percent said they were "very unsatisfied" or "unsatisfied" with the substance of the so-called fix.

If the first lesson is to get serious about the deficit, the second lesson for the White House is to go back to first principles and conduct this effort with more maturity and less partisanship.
When Barack Obama launched his campaign in 2007 he said, "... it's not the magnitude of our problems that concerns me the most. It's the smallness of our politics ... We have to change our politics, and come together around our common interests and concerns as Americans."

Why then, on the eve of the most important domestic policy debate in a generation, are the President's advisers talking about Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh and Fox News? Is this really a common interest and concern among Americans? Would the average voter consider this form of politics to be big or small?

By spending time on juvenile and crass partisan strategies the President's advisers triangulated the wrong target - their own allies. Their tone and tactics united Republicans (all 40 voted against the doctor fix) and caused 12 key allies to fall away.

The Barack Obama I know and worked with in the Senate (through his initiation) is capable of so much more. America needs that Barack Obama to change the tone and go back to attacking problems rather than personalities.

If he does, he'll find plenty of friends ready to work with him - old and new. Every Republican wants to enact comprehensive health care reform that lowers costs, improves quality and increases choice. No matter how often our motives are questioned we will be ready to discuss plans like the Patients' Choice Act, which I'm sponsoring with Senator Burr (R-NC) and Representatives Paul Ryan (R-WI) and Devin Nunes (R-CA), that cover more people than the Democrat plans without pushing our economy off a cliff.

Yes, elections have consequences. The White House certainly has the right to continue its clever partisan strategy. Yet, history shows this process will succeed only if it is truly bipartisan. The doctor fix debate showed that partisanship is the far riskier road.

__________________
Maddy
Matthew SEVEN!
Nathan is now THREE!
Maddy00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Join now to reply to this thread or open new ones for your questions & comments! FertileThoughts.com is the largest online community about infertility, adoption, pregnancy, parenting, surrogacy and any other family building subjects. Registration is open to everyone and FREE. Click Here to Register!

Google
 


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:25 PM.

DISCLAIMER: Fertile Thoughts allows advertisers to publish information about their services. Fertile Thoughts does not provide medical advice or endorse any particular service or approach to treating infertility. We encourage people to learn as much as possible about the range of options available before committing to any one. We also encourage users to share their thoughts on all fertility options on our forums.

VISIT OUR SISTER SITES:
JustMommies
Pregnancy Calendar
eHarmony Advice
Dating Advice
Project Wedding
Wedding Songs
Weddingbee
Wedding Blog

Copyright © 2009 eHarmony, Inc. All Rights Reserved.