Fertile Thoughts

Go Back   Fertile Thoughts > Community Forums > Debate Board
Forum Home Register Blogs HELP/FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read
Register Chat Users (0) Acronyms NEW USERS Community Guidelines Avatar Maker Tickers

Debate Board We want you to have a healthy debate here but keep in mind the rules of use policy. No slamming other users. No warning or explanation if you get banned. Sorry but it might take this for a few who do not follow the rules of use policy.

Currently Active Chat Room Users: 0 | Scheduled Chat Room Events
View Who's Online
Users in Chat Rooms:
No one's chatting right now!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-02-2009, 09:05 AM   #1 (permalink)
rae
10000-15000 post ace of hearts
 
rae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: You can take the girl out of TEXAS...
Posts: 13,229
rae Level 25rae Level 25rae Level 25rae Level 25rae Level 25rae Level 25rae Level 25rae Level 25rae Level 25rae Level 25rae Level 25
Changes signaled in SCOTUS?

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...ChX8wD9AF1GS02

Justice Stevens slows his hiring at high court

WASHINGTON — Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens has hired fewer law clerks than usual, generating speculation that the leader of the court's liberals will retire next year.

If Stevens does step down, he would give President Barack Obama his second high court opening in two years. Obama chose Justice Sonia Sotomayor for the court when Justice David Souter announced his retirement in May.

Souter's failure to hire clerks was the first signal that he was contemplating leaving the court.

Stevens, 89, joined the court in 1975 and is the second-oldest justice in the court's history, after Oliver Wendell Holmes. He is the seventh-longest-serving justice, with more than 33 years and eight months on the court.

In response to a question from The Associated Press, Stevens confirmed through a court spokeswoman Tuesday that he has hired only one clerk for the term that begins in October 2010. He is among several justices who typically have hired all four clerks for the following year by now. Information about this advance hiring is not released by the court but is regularly published by some legal blogs.

Stevens did not say whether he plans to hire his full allotment of clerks or whether he will leave the court at the conclusion of the term that begins next month. Retired justices are allowed to hire one clerk.

Former law clerks said the justice has for years hired all his clerks at once, usually in June or July of the year preceding their appointment. "I'd be surprised if he hired one but not four," said Columbia University law professor Jamal Greene, who worked for Stevens in 2006 and 2007.
But as to what that might mean, Greene said, "Frankly, your guess is as good as mine."

But one former clerk, University of Oklahoma law professor Joseph Thai, said he takes it as a sign that Stevens is likely to retire soon.

"It seems to indicate that he probably won't go beyond the current term," Thai said, cautioning that Stevens has said nothing to him about leaving.
Thai said Stevens could retire with his legacy secure and with little to gain from staying on a conservative-leaning court led by Chief Justice John Roberts.

"The other thing he could do by retiring sooner is achieve a sort of secondary legacy, by allowing President Obama to choose an ideologically compatible successor," Thai said.

When it comes to retirement, justices have their own "don't ask, don't tell" policy. Other than the occasional reporter, whose question typically is ignored, no one even bothers to ask justices when they will quit. That goes for their law clerks and even other justices.

So reading between the lines becomes more important. Souter often was the last justice to hire clerks, but when he hadn't even interviewed candidates by mid-April, the prospect that he might retire loomed ever larger.

Artemus Ward, who co-wrote a book on law clerks called "Sorcerers' Apprentices," said predicting retirements by looking at changes in when justices hire clerks often is futile. But Ward acknowledged that Souter's recent example has caused him to think about Stevens' possible departure in a new light.

Still, he said other factors might cause Stevens to stay on.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg had surgery this year for early-stage pancreatic cancer. While Ginsburg has been her usual energetic self, including frequent speaking engagements and a teaching stint in Europe this summer, long-term survival rates for pancreatic cancer are low.
Ginsburg, 76, has said she intends to serve into her early 80s, and she has hired her clerks for the court term that begins in October 2010.

Justices are reluctant to retire in bunches, mainly because they want the nine-member court as close to full strength as possible. If Ginsburg's health were to deteriorate, Stevens probably would stay, Ward said, because "protecting the institution takes precedence over personal departure decisions."

Stevens also is nearing two longevity records. When he joined the court, he replaced the longest-serving justice, William O. Douglas, and would need to serve until mid-July 2012 to top that service record. He would surpass Holmes as the oldest sitting justice if he were to remain on the court until Feb. 24, 2011.

Fordham Law School professor Abner Greene, a Stevens clerk in 1987 and 1988, said Stevens could step down next year having attained several milestones — his 90th birthday, 40 years as a judge and 35 on the Supreme Court.

But like other former employees, Greene said he has no idea what Stevens is planning.

__________________
I happen to be a proponent of single-payer, universal health care coverage. (2003) But, I don’t think we are going to be able to eliminate employer coverage immediately. There’s going to be potentially some transition process. I can envision a decade out or 15 years out or 20 years out where we’ve got a much more portable system. (2007) Barack Obama
rae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2009, 04:42 PM   #2 (permalink)
10000-15000 post ace of hearts
 
robine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: At the Tavern
Posts: 19,570
Blog Entries: 1787
robine Level 25robine Level 25robine Level 25robine Level 25robine Level 25robine Level 25robine Level 25robine Level 25robine Level 25robine Level 25robine Level 25
wonder if he is receiving dead fish in the mail??


I said something like this would happen..
__________________
Dictator, Dictator, There’s one little catch: We value our freedom That you want to dispatch. Dictator, Dictator, This could be you… Just Google the late Nicolae Ceaucescu.
robine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2009, 07:19 PM   #3 (permalink)
1000-4999 post queen of hearts
 
intheknow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sooo Conservative. Oh NO!
Posts: 4,215
Blog Entries: 303
intheknow Level 25intheknow Level 25intheknow Level 25intheknow Level 25intheknow Level 25intheknow Level 25intheknow Level 25intheknow Level 25intheknow Level 25intheknow Level 25intheknow Level 25
I guess The One will get a chance to nominate a true communist to the court this time. Who's to stop him? The RINOs will roll over and not fight.
__________________
Needed a Hero; Got a Zero.
Impeach Obama!
intheknow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2009, 07:39 AM   #4 (permalink)
5000-9999 post king of hearts
 
Lesley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,244
Lesley Level 25Lesley Level 25Lesley Level 25Lesley Level 25Lesley Level 25Lesley Level 25Lesley Level 25Lesley Level 25Lesley Level 25Lesley Level 25Lesley Level 25
Stevens was an extremely liberal judge. I'm not sure there could be anyone to match his liberal stance. Since Sotomayor was originally on the Republican short list, I assume there is a more moderate streak in her than most here are willing to admit. My guess is that Obama will push for a liberal judge...I just don't know if there is one out that is qualified as SCOTUS and as liberal as Stevens. One can only hope.

BTW, a liberal judge vs one that is communist seems to be opposite ends of a judicial spectrum. Communist and Rep seem much more in line. Taking away choices seems to be many of the end results of conservative legal matters. Absolute power to remove choices doesn't seem liberal to me. But you view it the way you want. I really don't care.

Extremist rehtoric right now has morphed from the screach of "Socialism" to gutteral call of "Communism". I guess the indoctrination of fear wasn't working with "socialism"...it was way over used. My strong suggestion is that non-libs don't over use the word "communism" either because it really does lose it's effect after a while and garners more eye rolling than anything else.
__________________
Lesley.
"A Conservative Government is an organized hypocrisy." Benjamin Disraeli

Last edited by Lesley; 09-03-2009 at 07:45 AM.
Lesley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2009, 09:09 AM   #5 (permalink)
10000-15000 post ace of hearts
 
robine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: At the Tavern
Posts: 19,570
Blog Entries: 1787
robine Level 25robine Level 25robine Level 25robine Level 25robine Level 25robine Level 25robine Level 25robine Level 25robine Level 25robine Level 25robine Level 25
when we become completely a socialistic nation, a whole lot more than simple eye rolling will be garnered by the govt...
__________________
Dictator, Dictator, There’s one little catch: We value our freedom That you want to dispatch. Dictator, Dictator, This could be you… Just Google the late Nicolae Ceaucescu.
robine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2009, 09:16 AM   #6 (permalink)
5000-9999 post king of hearts
 
Lesley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,244
Lesley Level 25Lesley Level 25Lesley Level 25Lesley Level 25Lesley Level 25Lesley Level 25Lesley Level 25Lesley Level 25Lesley Level 25Lesley Level 25Lesley Level 25
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...list_countries

interesting....the holler over the fear of socialism seems strongest right now because of healthcare reform. The socialist agenda being tied to the healthcare systems of GB, Canada, Australia, Norway or Sweden etc. Interesting not one seem to be classified Socialist. What a crock the Reps are trying to shove down the throats of the public. One might call them lies.
__________________
Lesley.
"A Conservative Government is an organized hypocrisy." Benjamin Disraeli

Last edited by Lesley; 09-03-2009 at 09:20 AM.
Lesley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2009, 07:11 PM   #7 (permalink)
10000-15000 post ace of hearts
 
robine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: At the Tavern
Posts: 19,570
Blog Entries: 1787
robine Level 25robine Level 25robine Level 25robine Level 25robine Level 25robine Level 25robine Level 25robine Level 25robine Level 25robine Level 25robine Level 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lesley View Post
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...list_countries

interesting....the holler over the fear of socialism seems strongest right now because of healthcare reform. The socialist agenda being tied to the healthcare systems of GB, Canada, Australia, Norway or Sweden etc. Interesting not one seem to be classified Socialist. What a crock the Reps are trying to shove down the throats of the public. One might call them lies.
Or one with a brain might not
__________________
Dictator, Dictator, There’s one little catch: We value our freedom That you want to dispatch. Dictator, Dictator, This could be you… Just Google the late Nicolae Ceaucescu.
robine is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Join now to reply to this thread or open new ones for your questions & comments! FertileThoughts.com is the largest online community about infertility, adoption, pregnancy, parenting, surrogacy and any other family building subjects. Registration is open to everyone and FREE. Click Here to Register!

Google
 


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:49 PM.

DISCLAIMER: Fertile Thoughts allows advertisers to publish information about their services. Fertile Thoughts does not provide medical advice or endorse any particular service or approach to treating infertility. We encourage people to learn as much as possible about the range of options available before committing to any one. We also encourage users to share their thoughts on all fertility options on our forums.